Skip to main content

Invention of achromat: a bitter fight over priority

The era of 1750s was an exciting time in the technology scene of England. Marine navigation of the empire demanded better time keeping and ever more precise celestial observation. Educated public was keenly interested in astronomy, partly from beliefs (still strong in our time) that celestial bodies determine our fate, partly from genuine desire to understand the Universe. Fortunes were made in manufacturing watches, navigation instruments, and telescopes.

Although refractive (lens-based) telescopes were already well known at that time, they suffered from chromatic aberrations, because of light dispersion in glass: light with different wavelength (color) propagates with different speed and thus gets focused at different distances from the lens, which creates colored fringes in the image. It was widely believed, due to Sir Isaac Newton's works, that chromatic aberration cannot be corrected with lenses. However, some scientists kept pursuing this lead, including Leonhard Euler, who proved theoretically that such lenses can exist.

An unlikely hero in this story, Chester Moore Hall was a barrister (a lawyer, don't confuse with barista), an educated men of independent means, and amateur optician. He surmised that since we don't see color fringes when using our bare eye, it must correct chromatic aberrations by some unknown mechanism. Since eye consists of refractive humours of different kinds, which are essentially lenses, a combination of glass lenses may also have the properties of color distortion correction. He succeeded in finding a lens pair which would do this job, by combining a positive and a negative lens of two dispersion types (crown, low dispersion, and flint, high dispersion). He wanted to keep his invention secret and ordered the two lenses from two different opticians, so each of them couldn't reverse-engineer his design. He didn't have time or desire to make a profit and fame of it, and it was designed solely for his own home-built telescope.

From there the story becomes a nerd blockbuster. The two opticians whom Hall ordered his lenses sub-contracted their orders to the same lens maker, George Bass. He realized that the two orders are from the same customer, so there must be some secret which the customer wanted to keep. Bass found the secret - the two lenses placed next to each other cancelled the chromatic aberration. Bass didn't keep the secret and started producing achromats and sharing the idea with others. The cat was out of the box.

In the 1750s Bass shared it with John Dollond, who recently started a business of making optical instruments with his son Peter. John Dollond immediately realized the importance of the idea, performed optical experiments to study the topic, and published a comprehensive paper in 1758 which made him famous and won him the Copley Medal of the Royal Society, the most prestigious scientific award in the United Kingdom, an honor that can be possibly compared to winning a Nobel in our time.

John Dollond also patented the achromat design, despite the fact it was already known and practiced by others, and him being not the original inventor. However, the Hall's original invention was never published, while Dollond took the idea, performed scientific experiments, re-designed the lens and published it in a way accessible to others.  Unfortunately John Dollond suddenly died in 1761 at the age of 54, at the peak of his fame.

After John Dollond's death his son Peter launched commercial production of achromatic telescopes and also took action against several London opticians who "infringed" his father's patent. He soon was counter-sued by thirty-five opticians for exploiting the patent on invention which was known and practiced before. This led to a long and bitter court fight, which Peter Dollond eventually won. The court ruled that although Hall is the original inventor of achromat, it was Dollond who had the merit of bringing it before the public as a useful invention.

Peter Dollond later became famous for inventing apochromatic lens, which corrected 3 colors instead of two as the achromat. He continued the optical business he started with his father. Dollond telescopes for terrestrial use were amongst the most popular in Great Britain and abroad for over a century. Their company, Dollond and Aichison, existed for more than 250 years, famous for the quality of their instruments. During the recent market crisis of 2009 they merged with Boots Opticians due to financial difficulties.

References
Chester Moor Hall, Britannica.com.
John Dollond, Encyclopedia.com.
Peter Dollond, Wikipedia.
Peter Dollond answers Jesse Ramsden, archive of the Museum of Science.
Dollond and Aitchison, Wikipedia.

The achromatic doublet. Image source.

Comments

  1. I Like to add one more important thing here, The Adaptive Optics Market is expected to be around US$ 4 Billion by 2025 at a CAGR of 40.5% in the given forecast period.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Best Bet On Sports - Jtm Hub
    JAMBI has partnered 제천 출장마사지 with the BetMGM Sportsbook app and is 여수 출장마사지 now the 세종특별자치 출장마사지 only online 서울특별 출장샵 sports 속초 출장마사지 betting app that is legal in Pennsylvania. All new players

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

3D modeling in a lab

About once a week I am asked by my colleagues which 3D modeling software I am using - usually when I am staring at the new part being 3D printed. I am using  Autodesk Inventor for a few reasons: it is a professional software for engineers and has huge community around it it provides free academic license there are thousands of youtube videos with detailed tutorials by enthusiasts easy to learn at a basic level, but there is always a lot of room for growth In a lab, there are two main workflows where Inventor is necessary: 3D modeling of complex assemblies (like custom-built microscope) and 3D printing. There are many youtube tutorials for beginners , so I here only review some things that Inventor can do, without any specific instructions.  3D modeling of parts and assemblies Before building a new microscope, you can create its virtual model and check dimensions, required adapters, and whether things will fit together. Luckily, Thorlabs has 3D model of nearly all it

How to connect a rotary encoder to Arduino and make your first PCB board

After I discovered the OpenStage project for cheap DIY microscopy stage automation, I decided to add a twist to it - control the stage positions manually with a rotary encoder, in addition to already-implemented serial port (USB). I found a nice RGB illuminated rotary encoder from Sparkfun  - it's shaft works as a button, and it is internally illuminated by built-in 3-color LEDs - a perfect device to switch speeds and manually control the stages. Hooking it up to Arduino seemed easy, and there is a very nice Encoder library to do just that. But when I started to test it, I fell into a deep rabbit hole called 'debouncing'. In short, real-world switches are never perfect and the 'moment' of switching has many messy things happening between the two leads, creating noise in the logic of reading device (Arduino). So, the voltage readout from a real rotary encoder looks like this: Note the high-frequency chirp in yellow line when it falls from high to low. T

Programming NI DAQmx board in Python: easier than you think!

For my DIY microscope I had a task - generate a train of digital pulses which simulate camera trigger, so that other devices (galvo and laser) are synched. I wanted to do it in Python , so that it seamlessly integrates in my data acquisition and analysis Jupyter notebook. After some quick search I found a PyDAQmx library which seemed mature and had good examples to begin with. Installation was smooth: download, unzip, open Anaconda prompt, python setup.py install After only 30 min fiddling, I was able to solve my problem in just a few lines of code: Holy crap, it just works, out of the box. Oscilloscope shows nice digital pulses every 100 ms, each 1 ms long. The code is much shorter and cleaner than would be in C, C#, or LabView. PyDAQmx appears to be a full-power wrapper around native NI DAQmx drivers (yes, they need to be installed), so presumably it can do all that can be done in C or even LabView (this statement needs to be tested). One can use PyDAQmx to control ga